Mayor Avetrana common Tarantino, where he consumed the sad story of Sarah Scazzi, closed the entry routes of the country to prevent bus of tourists from other regions - is said by Basilicata and Calabria - continued a pilgrimage to the places tragedy: the home of Misseri, the home of Scazzi, the well where he had been hiding the corpse of the murdered girl, the cemetery.
The macabre phenomenon of tourism is new, invented and nurtured by the mass media, which since August 26 that they do not talk about each other. No case has previously been the case at the center of national attention. And 'certainly an anomaly, that experts of sociology and social psychoanalysis will not fail to explain. But it is also a fact from which to draw several insights applicable to other fields, to understand the world in which we live.
And the world we live has no rules of any kind. Woe, therefore, to talk about faults! After all the facts now exceed the abnormal normal. The abnormal, the characters, you have to be so normal and contest the allegations. We have a Scrooge 'Scrooge makes the prime minister, always in conflict of interest with the public good and with the judges, and he boasts. We have an alternative, a homosexual who does not hide the fact her boyfriend and says he wants a son and he boasts. Normality? E 'remained the Church to support and defend it. Indeed, religions. Islam joke even less of Catholicism in terms of rules and normal! For
Avetrana happened a very serious, which has highlighted once again the evil of the human soul and the turbidity ingramigna in families, but unfortunately the facts as serious as they happen every day in Italy and worldwide. A boy who kills a young woman with a fist, the husband who kills his wife with a knife in front of little children, a mother who puts it in the washing machine spin the son born a few days ago that his wife killed her husband by her lovers, and so horror, are all events that are within a week to contend the primacy of wickedness. There was still the "Settimana Incom," the newspaper that once informed by the movie screens before the arrival of television, would have its great pains to choose which of these offer the audience in an overview which also includes other events. Full information, in fact, want it to be balanced overview. Today the leaders of various newspapers and TV stations do not pose more problems. Information and balanced view no longer exists. There are details, hypertrophied, retail repeated and magnified in an abnormal filigree to the deformation. In the case of Avetrana were devoted pages and pages of newspapers such as Corriere della Sera ", the" Print ", the" Republic ", if you are busy at all hours of the day's most popular television broadcasts, the same newscasts have lingered entire district 's hours. Obviously the time and space to talk about the case of Avetrana were diverted to other news, I do not know how much more important and useful to the viewer and society.
Why is that? And 'the information that is in the news this opportunity to capture public attention, and indeed to create the public or the public is forced to bend the information to their tastes and betraying its function? It 's very difficult to answer this question. Would at first to say: there is a substantial holding and osmotic, so a part influences the other, up to capacity.
Avetrana But if the case, as seen in its massmediaticità, contains the message, then see what is right and important.
The first is that people are unable to prevail in him a feeling for time and is emotionally messy. Opposite to the case of Sarah has proved incapable of feeling in sequence feelings of horror, disgust and pity. Second, it is abandoned to morbidity, to feel disappointed by the withdrawal the so-called "uncle ogre" of abusing her after she died. Third, it has been replaced in many expressions of regret for being almost excluded from such a "good" information from the show, living away from those places. Hence, almost in a claim for entitlement, organize trips to see them physically and maybe to get a photo as you do with the Fountain of Trevi in \u200b\u200bRome or the Duomo of Milan, with the singer with the popular or favorite player.
This desire to participate in the great media event, as well as to influence the protagonists of these unfortunate events, including lawyers, involved ordinary citizens of the endless anonymous viewers. A desire to say "I've been there and behold this is the evidence" showing a photo, prevailed on a normal feeling of pity for the young victim and sympathy for his family.
It is said that a democratic society is made of this information. Infinite broadcasters, zero complaint, absolute freedom, not just to try or not to indulge in feelings as consequential behavior. I feel sorrow and pity for Sarah? I lock myself in myself and I cry. I am overwhelmed by the desire to go to the places of his tragedy? And then I take the car, bus and go to take my fancy. Free and open to each other, nothing to say and nothing to say to one another. But, at least not be accused of anti-democracy those who think differently and believes the tourists idiots of the macabre, the gitaioli of stupidity. Why, in this case, I find it difficult to recognize democracy.
[]
0 comments:
Post a Comment