Sunday, January 30, 2011

Rolladen Shutters Installation

Nichi Vendola or normalization

There is no doubt that Nichi Vendola is to be lucky. Generally the vulgarized luck with that part of the anatomy that s'associa always been homosexuals, said today, with a more vague term and caresses, gay. Here in the Salento, then, the terms related to luck and certain body parts become more colorful and therefore less related to good taste. I do not know the reasons of such association, but if so they say, long live the popular wisdom is never wrong. In the case of
Vendola, however, on the luck factor and the anatomical part that we need to stress the vulgarization, because that his being gay is important component of its success. "Homosexuality - says of himself - is a piece of my schism in the 'two churches," the church community and the Catholic Church. " It will, and honors, but left his spiritual closeness to two churches, a vocation bichiesastica, if only to then turn away from both.
is a fact that was so clever to turn a traditionally negative factor, sexual diversity, in a positive factor, even charisma. People today want to diversity. The usual have betrayed the expectations, turned out to be trivial in their experiences of public and private life. Perhaps Berlusconi is an exception, which, however, expired in burlesque, kind of show with women and little women, nude and seminude, that move with comic intent and outcomes between male bodies and desecrating mushy and body parts made of hard plastic. The entrance to
Vendola of Deputies in 1992 was not smooth, there was a dispute over that seat, resolved in his favor because the majority of the center and was voted its pro domo. And already this says a lot, even if it is consistent with all his experience. He would always independent of situations merit, which did.
Then there is no doubt we can do. Thus he sums up: "There are always two vocations in me. The Nichi Vendola playful, anarchic, childish, narcissistic. And the tireless organizer, special surveillance of his own passions, invested with his public duties. Who is able to bend his character and to wager bets most paradoxical of his life. "
Attention to that "special surveillance." There is a component in Vendola disturbing, he pretends to be "playful and child-anarchist." E 'in the scowl, becoming high, accented with a round face and chubby in contrast with angular lines of those shows without reservation that it is. Nichi Vendola has not yet said who it is. Expression betrays a condition that feels like an innate, he feels a "special surveillance." But beware, he might say trivial: there is a Nichi Vendola knows that dominate his passions, instead toppled with a clever rhetorical maneuver the words using a subjective genitive, with the object (passions) that becomes the subject and he "special surveillance." Welcomes feel a subversive social: it is his narcissism.
also be that his stutter is barely a brushstroke in the hatch. His speech is not linear, but goes to circumlocutions. Stop a while, opens the way and then another, holding fast with surprising twists and turns discursive symbolic metaphors and evocative, inspiring wonder and emotionally involving the audience, like the baroque ingenuity. But in the end, she said? Boh! Like, and that is enough. There, among his exegetes, who will study the language and syntax as a phenomenon of poetic and political communication. He considers himself a poet.
At the time of his first encounter with rent for the chairmanship of the regional seemed to me an important person, sufficiently educated, intelligent, worked hard, consistently and courageously. The chairmanship of the region, albeit with some reservations, not trivially physical order, could okay. And then, I confess, I, Elector of Lease obtorto neck, I wanted to make this a most important victory for me and not only to me seemed obvious. Instead, it was not so, won the other, became the basin of all junctions and rivendicazionistiche antiberlusconiane here in Puglia antifittiane say that hinged in the most banal of politicians: Raffaele Lease. It was a victory for diversity on normality. But already the first victory in the primary area of \u200b\u200bits policy vs postdemocristiano Francesco Boccia, another regular, was the result of his innate good fortune of some first-rigged elections, and the support of so much local press that created the spot for election pass them off as news stories. One morning in Lecce on the most important monuments were hanging posters with slogans praising Vendola and gossip in the Lease. The next day the local newspaper pages and full pages filled with monuments and slogans.
Other Outrageous Fortune to his second win, having settled with ridiculous ease the poor Boccia, again rejected. Vendola if he saw a small figure, a sort of sacrificial victim of Lease, which did not go down that another had succeeded where he failed. This was helped by the sworn enemies of the Poli Bortone, the only one that could contend, do not say definitely win the Presidency of the Region. But I'm Stoppers, who lived in man Terlizzi are trivial moments of his great fortune.
Recently, a sociologist at the University of Bari, Onofrio Romano, wrote an essay on Vendola and the famous "Nichi mills, which are outside the rhetorical language of political-electoral committees actual permanent service in order to fabricate consensus. Something that evokes the titles of two famous essays, one of Dino Biondi, "The price of the Duce," and one of Renzo De Felice, "The years of consent", both referring to Mussolini.
About the leaders of the "Factory Zero", a little 'the headquarters of this organization, Romano writes: "Almost everyone has a relationship with a professional Apulia Region is largely gravitating to consultants within the departments most significant, but there are professionals that abut the institution for a large proportion of their fees, as well as members of companies and associations working with projects financed by the Region. In fact, part of the professional conduct is funded by the benefit of the Factories. " For the case of Roman structures within which it operates in a hierarchical relationship and using marketing tools and therefore "do not fall into a kind of democratic model."
like saying that the different Vendola is increasingly normalized as it advances toward the nomination for the Presidency of the Council. But his fall from Olympus is the normalization of its diversity on the pastures of Arcadia, where many vendors have illusions well known glories but also ominous conclusions. In its policy area have been noticed, has begun to falter.
[]

Rolladen Shutters Installation

Nichi Vendola or normalization

There is no doubt that Nichi Vendola is to be lucky. Generally the vulgarized luck with that part of the anatomy that s'associa always been homosexuals, said today, with a more vague term and caresses, gay. Here in the Salento, then, the terms related to luck and certain body parts become more colorful and therefore less related to good taste. I do not know the reasons of such association, but if so they say, long live the popular wisdom is never wrong. In the case of
Vendola, however, on the luck factor and the anatomical part that we need to stress the vulgarization, because that his being gay is important component of its success. "Homosexuality - says of himself - is a piece of my schism in the 'two churches," the church community and the Catholic Church. " It will, and honors, but left his spiritual closeness to two churches, a vocation bichiesastica, if only to then turn away from both.
is a fact that was so clever to turn a traditionally negative factor, sexual diversity, in a positive factor, even charisma. People today want to diversity. The usual have betrayed the expectations, turned out to be trivial in their experiences of public and private life. Perhaps Berlusconi is an exception, which, however, expired in burlesque, kind of show with women and little women, nude and seminude, that move with comic intent and outcomes between male bodies and desecrating mushy and body parts made of hard plastic. The entrance to
Vendola of Deputies in 1992 was not smooth, there was a dispute over that seat, resolved in his favor because the majority of the center and was voted its pro domo. And already this says a lot, even if it is consistent with all his experience. He would always independent of situations merit, which did.
Then there is no doubt we can do. Thus he sums up: "There are always two vocations in me. The Nichi Vendola playful, anarchic, childish, narcissistic. And the tireless organizer, special surveillance of his own passions, invested with his public duties. Who is able to bend his character and to wager bets most paradoxical of his life. "
Attention to that "special surveillance." There is a component in Vendola disturbing, he pretends to be "playful and child-anarchist." E 'in the scowl, becoming high, accented with a round face and chubby in contrast with angular lines of those shows without reservation that it is. Nichi Vendola has not yet said who it is. Expression betrays a condition that feels like an innate, he feels a "special surveillance." But beware, he might say trivial: there is a Nichi Vendola knows that dominate his passions, instead toppled with a clever rhetorical maneuver the words using a subjective genitive, with the object (passions) that becomes the subject and he "special surveillance." Welcomes feel a subversive social: it is his narcissism.
also be that his stutter is barely a brushstroke in the hatch. His speech is not linear, but goes to circumlocutions. Stop a while, opens the way and then another, holding fast with surprising twists and turns discursive symbolic metaphors and evocative, inspiring wonder and emotionally involving the audience, like the baroque ingenuity. But in the end, she said? Boh! Like, and that is enough. There, among his exegetes, who will study the language and syntax as a phenomenon of poetic and political communication. He considers himself a poet.
At the time of his first encounter with rent for the chairmanship of the regional seemed to me an important person, sufficiently educated, intelligent, worked hard, consistently and courageously. The chairmanship of the region, albeit with some reservations, not trivially physical order, could okay. And then, I confess, I, Elector of Lease obtorto neck, I wanted to make this a most important victory for me and not only to me seemed obvious. Instead, it was not so, won the other, became the basin of all junctions and rivendicazionistiche antiberlusconiane here in Puglia antifittiane say that hinged in the most banal of politicians: Raffaele Lease. It was a victory for diversity on normality. But already the first victory in the primary area of \u200b\u200bits policy vs postdemocristiano Francesco Boccia, another regular, was the result of his innate good fortune of some first-rigged elections, and the support of so much local press that created the spot for election pass them off as news stories. One morning in Lecce on the most important monuments were hanging posters with slogans praising Vendola and gossip in the Lease. The next day the local newspaper pages and full pages filled with monuments and slogans.
Other Outrageous Fortune to his second win, having settled with ridiculous ease the poor Boccia, again rejected. Vendola if he saw a small figure, a sort of sacrificial victim of Lease, which did not go down that another had succeeded where he failed. This was helped by the sworn enemies of the Poli Bortone, the only one that could contend, do not say definitely win the Presidency of the Region. But I'm Stoppers, who lived in man Terlizzi are trivial moments of his great fortune.
Recently, a sociologist at the University of Bari, Onofrio Romano, wrote an essay on Vendola and the famous "Nichi mills, which are outside the rhetorical language of political-electoral committees actual permanent service in order to fabricate consensus. Something that evokes the titles of two famous essays, one of Dino Biondi, "The price of the Duce," and one of Renzo De Felice, "The years of consent", both referring to Mussolini.
About the leaders of the "Factory Zero", a little 'the headquarters of this organization, Romano writes: "Almost everyone has a relationship with a professional Apulia Region is largely gravitating to consultants within the departments most significant, but there are professionals that abut the institution for a large proportion of their fees, as well as members of companies and associations working with projects financed by the Region. In fact, part of the professional conduct is funded by the benefit of the Factories. " For the case of Roman structures within which it operates in a hierarchical relationship and using marketing tools and therefore "do not fall into a kind of democratic model."
like saying that the different Vendola is increasingly normalized as it advances toward the nomination for the Presidency of the Council. But his fall from Olympus is the normalization of its diversity on the pastures of Arcadia, where many vendors have illusions well known glories but also ominous conclusions. In its policy area have been noticed, has begun to falter.
[]

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Can You Use Woolite In He Machines

Judiciary-Berlusconi is a duel of honor!

In a serious country the clash Judiciary-Berlusconi was expected to show the beheading - politics, please! - One of the two parties. Regardless of the atrocities, real or alleged, of Berlusconi and judicial persecution, even those real or imagined, by the judiciary, a fight of this magnitude should be resolved without compromise. According to rules of chivalry or duels of honor to the death!
If Berlusconi is guilty and has tarnished the institution representing the nation and all of those sins contestategli, then it must be banned from any public office. If, however, was to be part of the judiciary and political persecution with his powerful means Berlusconi, then those judges who have been involved are condemned to live the rest of their days in some social center of their choice. If, however, serious crimes have both one and the other hand, as is likely, then you punish people in both involved once and for all.
The whole world laughs with a prime minister who organizes orgies and revels in his home and a judiciary that is politics. It would be bad enough if the world we deridesse only one of two things, being mocked for both is frankly unbearable. The one thing makes more striking the other in a mutual magnified for all to see. There
who does not condemn the conduct of Berlusconi, but there is not one who does not care about the behavior of certain magistrates, who are engaged in something that shows the Austrians in World War I called Strafexpedition (punitive expedition ). The same President of the Republic, speaking of trouble, can not appeal to both parties.
It is now obvious that the reasons on both sides are nothing in comparison to the interests of the nation. The Italian people are tired of feeling like a cock-fight and cheer for one or the other.
What to observe how very serious in this country several authorities are likely to act with authority and strength. The Church does not go beyond general references, the President of the Republic to as many general concerns. The bodies of the judiciary expressed an interest in corporate and political worthy of a better cause. L ' intelligentsia is divided on the sidelines and has lost credibility. Berlusconi's children, who might be on the parent to be spared from so much mud that it rains on them, they can not say no to either bai. The same political forces allied to Berlusconi can not tell him to behave as decent and interest for the good of all and lined up in his defense as if they were at Thermopylae.
I wonder where it ended the right ethical and social in this country, the right of law, once widespread in all social strata. Ordered to become a government force, the political right, going back to the State Ethics and the welfare state, today, even I say fear not to look back, not to become a Gorgon, but even to look down on the side to see which people find themselves next door. The former component
MSI and former aennina, remained immune to the leakage to a fraudulent unknown modern and European- Fregoli Fini, Berlusconi does not require to behave in a more composed, since at stake is not only his personal reputation but also that of the entire political party that represents, as a whole and the individual, and the entire nation.
There is a part of the center of the political class that is highly respected, which is really the best part of the transformation process policy in recent years. I am referring to the many ministers who have shown not only to know how the ministers but also had an exemplary conduct as private and public men. Tremonti, Maroni, Frattini, Gelmini, Brunetta, Carfagna, Alfano, Prestigiacomo, La Russa may or may not like, but do not appear in the chronicles of gossip and embezzlement. Why not make them strong in this authority conferred upon him, conquered the field, from Berlusconi to demand greater respect for rules, appropriate caution in public and private behavior, greater caution in the choice of certain frequenters of his house?
It is not clear what relationship they can have people with the former MSI depraved and degenerate as the shadowy figures called into question in recent days. Once they had the right to disgust whores, pimps and the like, because then these are common and frequent Berlusconi. Today, however, inexplicably, it is believed that the right to attend such scum is a sign of political empowerment and a victory of democratic credibility. When liberals were never guaranteed and the MSI game when he was in the best interests of the nation?
People feel disgusted and worried not only by what is happening in our country, but there is no individual who does not feel mortified to imagine a man like Berlusconi, who in other respects has proven to be a man value and great human resources, put his honor and his political fate between the legs of four sockets and inane in the hands of disgusting pimp.
On the other hand there is no citizen who is not pissed off bad for a judiciary that has no time and means to resolve the legal problems of people and then have time and facilities for the sake of completeness to spy in the house of political persecution by ; for a judiciary that blunts the sense of the state and the interests of the nation with a supposedly inanimate automatic judiciary.
In a serious country this would not happen, not happen. In our condition is now normal. If we want to retrieve the right size we have to square clean, starting from the lot that is open for sixteen years now: Berlusconi or the judiciary or diverted, or both should be punished.
[]

Can You Use Woolite In He Machines

Judiciary-Berlusconi is a duel of honor!

In a serious country the clash Judiciary-Berlusconi was expected to show the beheading - politics, please! - One of the two parties. Regardless of the atrocities, real or alleged, of Berlusconi and judicial persecution, even those real or imagined, by the judiciary, a fight of this magnitude should be resolved without compromise. According to rules of chivalry or duels of honor to the death!
If Berlusconi is guilty and has tarnished the institution representing the nation and all of those sins contestategli, then it must be banned from any public office. If, however, was to be part of the judiciary and political persecution with his powerful means Berlusconi, then those judges who have been involved are condemned to live the rest of their days in some social center of their choice. If, however, serious crimes have both one and the other hand, as is likely, then you punish people in both involved once and for all.
The whole world laughs with a prime minister who organizes orgies and revels in his home and a judiciary that is politics. It would be bad enough if the world we deridesse only one of two things, being mocked for both is frankly unbearable. The one thing makes more striking the other in a mutual magnified for all to see. There
who does not condemn the conduct of Berlusconi, but there is not one who does not care about the behavior of certain magistrates, who are engaged in something that shows the Austrians in World War I called Strafexpedition (punitive expedition ). The same President of the Republic, speaking of trouble, can not appeal to both parties.
It is now obvious that the reasons on both sides are nothing in comparison to the interests of the nation. The Italian people are tired of feeling like a cock-fight and cheer for one or the other.
What to observe how very serious in this country several authorities are likely to act with authority and strength. The Church does not go beyond general references, the President of the Republic to as many general concerns. The bodies of the judiciary expressed an interest in corporate and political worthy of a better cause. L ' intelligentsia is divided on the sidelines and has lost credibility. Berlusconi's children, who might be on the parent to be spared from so much mud that it rains on them, they can not say no to either bai. The same political forces allied to Berlusconi can not tell him to behave as decent and interest for the good of all and lined up in his defense as if they were at Thermopylae.
I wonder where it ended the right ethical and social in this country, the right of law, once widespread in all social strata. Ordered to become a government force, the political right, going back to the State Ethics and the welfare state, today, even I say fear not to look back, not to become a Gorgon, but even to look down on the side to see which people find themselves next door. The former component
MSI and former aennina, remained immune to the leakage to a fraudulent unknown modern and European- Fregoli Fini, Berlusconi does not require to behave in a more composed, since at stake is not only his personal reputation but also that of the entire political party that represents, as a whole and the individual, and the entire nation.
There is a part of the center of the political class that is highly respected, which is really the best part of the transformation process policy in recent years. I am referring to the many ministers who have shown not only to know how the ministers but also had an exemplary conduct as private and public men. Tremonti, Maroni, Frattini, Gelmini, Brunetta, Carfagna, Alfano, Prestigiacomo, La Russa may or may not like, but do not appear in the chronicles of gossip and embezzlement. Why not make them strong in this authority conferred upon him, conquered the field, from Berlusconi to demand greater respect for rules, appropriate caution in public and private behavior, greater caution in the choice of certain frequenters of his house?
It is not clear what relationship they can have people with the former MSI depraved and degenerate as the shadowy figures called into question in recent days. Once they had the right to disgust whores, pimps and the like, because then these are common and frequent Berlusconi. Today, however, inexplicably, it is believed that the right to attend such scum is a sign of political empowerment and a victory of democratic credibility. When liberals were never guaranteed and the MSI game when he was in the best interests of the nation?
People feel disgusted and worried not only by what is happening in our country, but there is no individual who does not feel mortified to imagine a man like Berlusconi, who in other respects has proven to be a man value and great human resources, put his honor and his political fate between the legs of four sockets and inane in the hands of disgusting pimp.
On the other hand there is no citizen who is not pissed off bad for a judiciary that has no time and means to resolve the legal problems of people and then have time and facilities for the sake of completeness to spy in the house of political persecution by ; for a judiciary that blunts the sense of the state and the interests of the nation with a supposedly inanimate automatic judiciary.
In a serious country this would not happen, not happen. In our condition is now normal. If we want to retrieve the right size we have to square clean, starting from the lot that is open for sixteen years now: Berlusconi or the judiciary or diverted, or both should be punished.
[]

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Hcl Laptop Driver Ec2

Justice and Berlusconi: Never mind the disease raging

aftermath of the third ruling on the dismissal of such failure by the Constitutional Court, hypocritically played by each of its success as a political party, Berlusconi has received yet another warning of crime . A rail connection from Switzerland. This time, for a change, is accused of child prostitution with a queue of other no less serious crimes. A story from the film-cake, with Lele Mora and director Emilio Fede for help, if not advised offense as well. We're not kidding. From Naomi / Papi to Ruby / Bunga-Bunga, the country is all a movie set under the eyes of the world.
Although now there is this lousy soup dished up by sixteen years, morning, noon and night, the stomach is not accustomed, and to throw up every time. It is not only embarrassing, it is intolerable! Use anathemas, appealing to the ethics and public virtue, which prevail in our land since the time of Rome's oldest, is how to declare the failure of an ancient civilization, which shows that they no longer means of defense.
The role of prime minister inevitably exposes to the public. Neither Berlusconi nor others so he can plead the privacy. There is no private life for someone who has taken the lead role of a nation. You can only deny the substance of the accusation. And that makes the person concerned and his lawyers, for which until now has spent three hundred million Euros. Ipse dixit .
for ease of argument we take as true all that is said of him, and that he himself does not deny in part. A citizen worthy of respect, though, that has a minimum of critical thinking and has the right to influence the vote with the life of the country, can not stop indignation, free and discounted as the holy oil, has at least three stages of mental to go.
The first is that Berlusconi exposes the country to international ridicule of vice, the Italian judiciary exposes admiration for virtue. It seems that vice and virtue of one of the other are essential. But who is the worst part is the major figure of the Italian people, who, on time, despite everything, vote for Berlusconi. So the fault lies with the party that defends the vote, the virtue on the part that denounces and fights. They may be some examples, these, but there you are: vicious against virtuous. A similar gap is misleading and unacceptable.
The second is that those who are with Berlusconi can not accept the vice so, sic et simpliciter . First of all, have the right to ask why so much rage against Berlusconi's judiciary, which, apart from personal defects, interprets the political thought and the needs of millions of citizens, representing the country at the highest international standards to the point that his personal achievements are also the successes of the country Italy. Since we are not talking only of little women who are passionate about the "Big Brother" and are moved by participating in competitions "Friends", but also people who know exactly how they go and how things go in Italy, that's not an irrelevant screen virtuoso on the judiciary. The slow, not to define it differently, of the Italian judiciary is proverbial in the world as spaghetti and pizza. It is surprising, however, that if Berlusconi is so diligent, punctual and continues to point to constitute a Special Tribunal. It 'as also strong evidence that most of the raids and erotic Berlusconi, that a significant proportion of the judiciary is a common training and that always feels that militia in the service of the Communist Party or what's left, which was meant to seize power for the true liberation of the country. The courts have the place it occupies in the party. It is known that the Communist Party had its own training school which prepares students to enter competitions for the judiciary, had others with the same goal: to occupy positions of leadership in any other field of public life. It was the strategy of creeping revolution, after it was abandoned because it is not practicable, the violent impact. These things now seem political fiction. Instead, they are obvious, obvious, banal. Political parties - and the Communist Party was the party of all, not for nothing that his secretary was the best - spread out across employment centers through consensus in decision-making at all levels. It is surprising that such a reading is refused, when you simply take booklet of any policy or history of Italy in the second half of the twentieth century to light on the techniques used by parties to win popular support. This does not mean that the judiciary militant initiate legal action against Berlusconi when it comes to knowledge of a crime that concerns him, however, is the mandatory penalty, only for political commitment, it simply means that it starts the legal proceedings even when he knows perfectly well that does not lead to any concrete results, only to inflict a blow to the image of Berlusconi, forcing him to resort to lawyers to keep him from governing effectively. A judiciary that does not matter so much to condemn Berlusconi immediately, as it continued to keep him in check, to prevent judicial policy under siege; gutta cavat lapidem said the Latins. All this is now so obvious that there is no person-to medium-low intelligence might not have understood. The Judiciary is the judicial arm of a political party, in this case the center. Denying it extends even where there is bad faith.
The third stage is political. Who is in the center-right Berlusconi outraged the vagaries of neither more nor less than who is in the center. It sucks - I was going to say one thing - it sucks for everyone. But if one is on the side of Berlusconi is for political reasons, because it shares in all or part of the political action, it is recognized in whole or in part in his vision of public affairs. He adds, is also well aware that neither the center nor in the center there is no alternative to Berlusconi. So rather than demolish a reality, although not like in some respects but not least an alternative, although governments prefer a government that is mature in the meantime in the hope that new political situation, the political leadership clearly hoped, but better quality and above all more dignified.
[]

Hcl Laptop Driver Ec2

Justice and Berlusconi: Never mind the disease raging

aftermath of the third ruling on the dismissal of such failure by the Constitutional Court, hypocritically played by each of its success as a political party, Berlusconi has received yet another warning of crime . A rail connection from Switzerland. This time, for a change, is accused of child prostitution with a queue of other no less serious crimes. A story from the film-cake, with Lele Mora and director Emilio Fede for help, if not advised offense as well. We're not kidding. From Naomi / Papi to Ruby / Bunga-Bunga, the country is all a movie set under the eyes of the world.
Although now there is this lousy soup dished up by sixteen years, morning, noon and night, the stomach is not accustomed, and to throw up every time. It is not only embarrassing, it is intolerable! Use anathemas, appealing to the ethics and public virtue, which prevail in our land since the time of Rome's oldest, is how to declare the failure of an ancient civilization, which shows that they no longer means of defense.
The role of prime minister inevitably exposes to the public. Neither Berlusconi nor others so he can plead the privacy. There is no private life for someone who has taken the lead role of a nation. You can only deny the substance of the accusation. And that makes the person concerned and his lawyers, for which until now has spent three hundred million Euros. Ipse dixit .
for ease of argument we take as true all that is said of him, and that he himself does not deny in part. A citizen worthy of respect, though, that has a minimum of critical thinking and has the right to influence the vote with the life of the country, can not stop indignation, free and discounted as the holy oil, has at least three stages of mental to go.
The first is that Berlusconi exposes the country to international ridicule of vice, the Italian judiciary exposes admiration for virtue. It seems that vice and virtue of one of the other are essential. But who is the worst part is the major figure of the Italian people, who, on time, despite everything, vote for Berlusconi. So the fault lies with the party that defends the vote, the virtue on the part that denounces and fights. They may be some examples, these, but there you are: vicious against virtuous. A similar gap is misleading and unacceptable.
The second is that those who are with Berlusconi can not accept the vice so, sic et simpliciter . First of all, have the right to ask why so much rage against Berlusconi's judiciary, which, apart from personal defects, interprets the political thought and the needs of millions of citizens, representing the country at the highest international standards to the point that his personal achievements are also the successes of the country Italy. Since we are not talking only of little women who are passionate about the "Big Brother" and are moved by participating in competitions "Friends", but also people who know exactly how they go and how things go in Italy, that's not an irrelevant screen virtuoso on the judiciary. The slow, not to define it differently, of the Italian judiciary is proverbial in the world as spaghetti and pizza. It is surprising, however, that if Berlusconi is so diligent, punctual and continues to point to constitute a Special Tribunal. It 'as also strong evidence that most of the raids and erotic Berlusconi, that a significant proportion of the judiciary is a common training and that always feels that militia in the service of the Communist Party or what's left, which was meant to seize power for the true liberation of the country. The courts have the place it occupies in the party. It is known that the Communist Party had its own training school which prepares students to enter competitions for the judiciary, had others with the same goal: to occupy positions of leadership in any other field of public life. It was the strategy of creeping revolution, after it was abandoned because it is not practicable, the violent impact. These things now seem political fiction. Instead, they are obvious, obvious, banal. Political parties - and the Communist Party was the party of all, not for nothing that his secretary was the best - spread out across employment centers through consensus in decision-making at all levels. It is surprising that such a reading is refused, when you simply take booklet of any policy or history of Italy in the second half of the twentieth century to light on the techniques used by parties to win popular support. This does not mean that the judiciary militant initiate legal action against Berlusconi when it comes to knowledge of a crime that concerns him, however, is the mandatory penalty, only for political commitment, it simply means that it starts the legal proceedings even when he knows perfectly well that does not lead to any concrete results, only to inflict a blow to the image of Berlusconi, forcing him to resort to lawyers to keep him from governing effectively. A judiciary that does not matter so much to condemn Berlusconi immediately, as it continued to keep him in check, to prevent judicial policy under siege; gutta cavat lapidem said the Latins. All this is now so obvious that there is no person-to medium-low intelligence might not have understood. The Judiciary is the judicial arm of a political party, in this case the center. Denying it extends even where there is bad faith.
The third stage is political. Who is in the center-right Berlusconi outraged the vagaries of neither more nor less than who is in the center. It sucks - I was going to say one thing - it sucks for everyone. But if one is on the side of Berlusconi is for political reasons, because it shares in all or part of the political action, it is recognized in whole or in part in his vision of public affairs. He adds, is also well aware that neither the center nor in the center there is no alternative to Berlusconi. So rather than demolish a reality, although not like in some respects but not least an alternative, although governments prefer a government that is mature in the meantime in the hope that new political situation, the political leadership clearly hoped, but better quality and above all more dignified.
[]

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Airconditioner -ogeneral-asg18baj

Battisti, is much better for everyone

worse than the disease itself and speaking, especially when it produces terrible memories and there is a common national sentiment on the case, and indeed the tears produced are added other lacerations. It 's the case of each other Baptists, of which, now for a refusal of extradition for another hour, we still talk about it even at the risk of damaging international relations of our country, now with France, now with Brazil.
President Napolitano has bitterly admitted, we can not make ourselves understood by friends, near and far, on what has been terrorism in Italy and the sacrifices involved in combating it and defeat it. In diplomatic language is resentment against France and Brazil for having denied the murderer because Baptists serve the sentence in Italy.
Besides, in an atmosphere celebrating the unification of Italy Cesare Battisti evokes the name of other characters that deserve a very different recollection. Summon Cesare Battisti, the irredentist Trentino, socialist, friend of Mussolini in the days of "The Future of Work", executed by the Austrians in 1916 for his Italian. It is found about a century after having to share the same name complete, the first and last name with a terrorist, murderer and pluricondannato.
It is said that Baptists today is a good writer noir, a genre that clearly has it in the genetic and personal experience. The kids today who do not know more the history of Italy, do not know who is Cesare Battisti "a" but, by dint of the mention every day this name, they know who is Cesare Battisti "two", the only Cesare Battisti they know.
Some say it will put an end to this sad and unfortunate event when it will be extradited to Italy, where he will serve his four life sentences, sentence has been passed.
I disagree, not because she believes that should not serve his sentence - after all it is worth living in for years, some 'on the run and a bit' in prison - in fact, but because how could they get the things in Italy with his return will add damage damage, would open a new chapter. Risk of feeling about him for who knows how many more years. Because - We can be certain - would start the obsession of grace, as was the case for Adriano Sofri, leader of "Lotta Continua" condemned the murder as principal of the Commissioner Luigi Calabresi, now revered columnist of "La Repubblica". If only for this unfortunate event, doing violence to my concept of retributive justice education, I believe that Baptists should be left where it is.
not seem inconsistent. The story Baptists opened three fronts in debate over which we have to think coolly. One is that those who commit of criminal activity, whatever the reasons to have induced him, he must serve his sentence for priority social need and the respect for the victims. Two, dealing with a phenomenon so complex and varied as the terrorism was to be sought a political solution that includes and exceeds the individual cases, a sort of social amnesty. Three, you can not put the crisis in international relations to a matter that it is none of justice and internal history.
On the first front, I believe that those who commit a crime and is convicted should serve their sentence to the end, regardless of any and all consideration. It 'true that the Constitution of the Republic, art. 27, wants "The penis [...] are aimed at rehabilitation of the offender. " This does not mean that they should be granted. In living out the sentence, the offender can not only re-education, but it can become an example for others.
The second front, cossighiana the theory of "civil war", so you should find a political solution, one can not but note that it reduces the complex story of a war confined to the belligerent and excludes political society. In principle it is wrong to open gates in the sovereignty of the state, creating instability, free zones, within which to justify crimes against the state itself, its institutions and private citizens. It would mean that the state grant and grant some vacatio is at least one of the founding of the social contract: the administration of justice. And this is absolutely unacceptable. The political forces "belligerent" may recognize right and wrong, to have second thoughts or anything, but can not claim to create a vulnus the State, which must always impose the rule of law. In some respects the fact that Baptists are outside Italy and do not want to extradite him is not fair but affordable. If it was in Italy would be worse, would be out of the most heated argument innocent or guilty, or justificationism intransigent. We must not forget the thousands who were signatories of the manifesto in its favor. The damage that it would be politically would be even more serious than the first human and legal then.
The third front is different from the first two because it concerns the external relations of the state. Here are other more and more important interests. France, for example, is a sister nation, has always been part of the European Community. Is a different story of Carla Bruni luckily we are all children of his mother. We have economic relations with Brazil the most important. Undermining good relations with these two countries would be wrong. Of course, there is the slap trimming France a few years ago, when he graciously Battisti escape, and the slap of Brazil, who even deny us the reasons for extradition with offensive and damaging to our dignity.
If Italy was the country that the political authorities suspect Brazil, a country that is still resentful and ready to get back at Baptist, would not be an impossible reach into their house and let him go the way it deserves. As they always have and still do like some countries, between Communism and banditry, in which that Lula has always inspired.
Italy, however, is so civil that while requiring the extradition, an essential requirement for the legal culture, hopes it will not grant it to him for a cynical political expediency. But Lula can not understand this!
[]

Airconditioner -ogeneral-asg18baj

Battisti, is much better for everyone

worse than the disease itself and speaking, especially when it produces terrible memories and there is a common national sentiment on the case, and indeed the tears produced are added other lacerations. It 's the case of each other Baptists, of which, now for a refusal of extradition for another hour, we still talk about it even at the risk of damaging international relations of our country, now with France, now with Brazil.
President Napolitano has bitterly admitted, we can not make ourselves understood by friends, near and far, on what has been terrorism in Italy and the sacrifices involved in combating it and defeat it. In diplomatic language is resentment against France and Brazil for having denied the murderer because Baptists serve the sentence in Italy.
Besides, in an atmosphere celebrating the unification of Italy Cesare Battisti evokes the name of other characters that deserve a very different recollection. Summon Cesare Battisti, the irredentist Trentino, socialist, friend of Mussolini in the days of "The Future of Work", executed by the Austrians in 1916 for his Italian. It is found about a century after having to share the same name complete, the first and last name with a terrorist, murderer and pluricondannato.
It is said that Baptists today is a good writer noir, a genre that clearly has it in the genetic and personal experience. The kids today who do not know more the history of Italy, do not know who is Cesare Battisti "a" but, by dint of the mention every day this name, they know who is Cesare Battisti "two", the only Cesare Battisti they know.
Some say it will put an end to this sad and unfortunate event when it will be extradited to Italy, where he will serve his four life sentences, sentence has been passed.
I disagree, not because she believes that should not serve his sentence - after all it is worth living in for years, some 'on the run and a bit' in prison - in fact, but because how could they get the things in Italy with his return will add damage damage, would open a new chapter. Risk of feeling about him for who knows how many more years. Because - We can be certain - would start the obsession of grace, as was the case for Adriano Sofri, leader of "Lotta Continua" condemned the murder as principal of the Commissioner Luigi Calabresi, now revered columnist of "La Repubblica". If only for this unfortunate event, doing violence to my concept of retributive justice education, I believe that Baptists should be left where it is.
not seem inconsistent. The story Baptists opened three fronts in debate over which we have to think coolly. One is that those who commit of criminal activity, whatever the reasons to have induced him, he must serve his sentence for priority social need and the respect for the victims. Two, dealing with a phenomenon so complex and varied as the terrorism was to be sought a political solution that includes and exceeds the individual cases, a sort of social amnesty. Three, you can not put the crisis in international relations to a matter that it is none of justice and internal history.
On the first front, I believe that those who commit a crime and is convicted should serve their sentence to the end, regardless of any and all consideration. It 'true that the Constitution of the Republic, art. 27, wants "The penis [...] are aimed at rehabilitation of the offender. " This does not mean that they should be granted. In living out the sentence, the offender can not only re-education, but it can become an example for others.
The second front, cossighiana the theory of "civil war", so you should find a political solution, one can not but note that it reduces the complex story of a war confined to the belligerent and excludes political society. In principle it is wrong to open gates in the sovereignty of the state, creating instability, free zones, within which to justify crimes against the state itself, its institutions and private citizens. It would mean that the state grant and grant some vacatio is at least one of the founding of the social contract: the administration of justice. And this is absolutely unacceptable. The political forces "belligerent" may recognize right and wrong, to have second thoughts or anything, but can not claim to create a vulnus the State, which must always impose the rule of law. In some respects the fact that Baptists are outside Italy and do not want to extradite him is not fair but affordable. If it was in Italy would be worse, would be out of the most heated argument innocent or guilty, or justificationism intransigent. We must not forget the thousands who were signatories of the manifesto in its favor. The damage that it would be politically would be even more serious than the first human and legal then.
The third front is different from the first two because it concerns the external relations of the state. Here are other more and more important interests. France, for example, is a sister nation, has always been part of the European Community. Is a different story of Carla Bruni luckily we are all children of his mother. We have economic relations with Brazil the most important. Undermining good relations with these two countries would be wrong. Of course, there is the slap trimming France a few years ago, when he graciously Battisti escape, and the slap of Brazil, who even deny us the reasons for extradition with offensive and damaging to our dignity.
If Italy was the country that the political authorities suspect Brazil, a country that is still resentful and ready to get back at Baptist, would not be an impossible reach into their house and let him go the way it deserves. As they always have and still do like some countries, between Communism and banditry, in which that Lula has always inspired.
Italy, however, is so civil that while requiring the extradition, an essential requirement for the legal culture, hopes it will not grant it to him for a cynical political expediency. But Lula can not understand this!
[]

Monday, January 3, 2011

Warning: Realpath() [function.realpath]

a good 2011, and toasts

sabato 8 gennaio ore 11:00, c/o pub il Ristoro a  Oriago, Brindisi Socialista di beneaugurio per il 2011.
Sarà un occasione per farci gli auguri e
scambiare  un po' d'opinioni.
 Siete tutti invitati


Warning: Realpath() [function.realpath]

a good 2011, and toasts

sabato 8 gennaio ore 11:00, c/o pub il Ristoro a  Oriago, Brindisi Socialista di beneaugurio per il 2011.
Sarà un occasione per farci gli auguri e
scambiare  un po' d'opinioni.
 Siete tutti invitati


Sunday, January 2, 2011

Treatment Helicobacter 2009

But because lawyers are not the facts? Reformists

I always wondered why lawyers who make speeches or indictments, according to accuse or defend, they are not the facts. They need more and dodge, to open towards different directions, to minimize or exaggerate the facts and to place people in a context in which they are often like cabbage. One is accused of violence? Well, the lawyer who defends it says it's a good, a circumstance that helped a little old to carry a heavy pack on the first floor of the house, which is always the charity at the traffic lights, which defended the road to a girl from a molester , you always did his best for others and so on. Yes, but in fact the subject of proceedings, it was violent or not? Wow, says the lawyer who attacked him. There has to be violent to a child who liked to burn the rubbish bins and to break the street lamps in public lighting, which is the son of a thug, a mother who is a scoundrel, who has a sister who makes beautiful life and a drug addict and drug dealer brother. And then - ends - one with a face like that, that's scary just to see him, can not be a bad thing?
Now, because the judges do not interrupt the lawyers when they are incontinent and sproloquianti to go beyond the fact and fix in D? Why allow them to do appraisals on people who are unconnected to that fact? That encroach on ratings and Lombroso even racist? Why allow a girl who has been violated is referred to in court by a lawyer defending the rapist to appreciate damaging to his reputation, adding violence to violence?
up to me, for a genuine reform of justice, since the reform of all its operators. A cultural reform, including through mechanisms for offenders. Lawyers imporrei strict adherence to the fact of the dispute, the banner of essentiality.
Once the final exams, when written in Italian was an issue - I speak advisedly, having made the commissioner of the Italian dozens and dozens of state exams - the first criterion for consideration by the Board was " adherence to the track, "conditio sine qua non to avoid having to evaluate a paper, even a masterpiece, but the track had no relevance whatsoever, or only some limited reference.
Grip, therefore, essential. Would reduce the process time and especially do not turn the courtroom into chicken coops, with lots of roosters and hens that peck, to the detriment of the citizen, whether he is there as a defendant, either as victim or as a witness.
I think it happened to anyone in life to be in a courtroom. You will observe that it is one of the most annoying troubles, I say serious, there are others, saying the dogs. Indeed, even the dogs, not to offend the animals.
It happened to me a few years ago. I learned that unfortunate circumstance of being a slanderer, an arrogant, who enjoyed an insult to those who devote themselves to the common good. I had the guilt of having an article published in the journal in which I directed the wrongdoing complained of a mayor, who sued me thereof. That was a Communist mayor and sued us non per dimostrare che avesse ragione e noi torto, ma perché comunque ci infliggeva un danno economico, secondo una tattica ampiamente collaudata e applicata contro la stampa nemica. L’avvocato che difendeva quel sindaco ci accusò di essere dei calunniatori, avendo pubblicato notizie false e tendenziose, e che il suo cliente era così buono che era disposto a perdonarci. Noi rifiutammo la proposta di remissione di querela avanzata anche dal Presidente, che voleva accordarci, e chiedemmo invece che si discutesse nel merito. Per tutta risposta, quell’avvocato gridò ore rotundo e con gestualità teatrale: “Ecco, Signor Presidente, che Le avevo detto? Sono due tracotanti”.
E dire che I and my partner we were convinced that they are worthy of public morality!
On another occasion I heard was a violent, a tyrant, a torturer and "Say no more" - he said that miserable as a lawyer - because if I said what I know about him I would not leave the house. " Imagine, I had to go to school every day! Pure Inventions with the technique of preterizione: and do not say that ... , typical of lawyers. A veritable lynching, which the present case, moreover, had nothing to do, the President of the Court of Appeals watched it verbum quidem .
Recently, in the first trial against the young Colitti Ugento for the murder of Peppino Basile, the lawyer who defended him in his speech that turned out to things with the offense and the prosecution had nothing to do with anything, the series : The mayor had brought flowers to the girl who had testified, the thesis of the pastor "courage" and so on, which evoked bitter controversy that took place in the country and verging on politics. And when the mayor has publicly complained about the belligerent lawyer attacked him extra moenia. It did not stop there, because if it is taken with the Public Ministry and has also been received for the chief prosecutor, who had commented con molta prudenza e con rispetto la sentenza di assoluzione, da lui trovata “singolare”.
Gli avvocati dovrebbero darsi una regolata. Essi sono uno dei mali della giustizia. Anzi, non sarebbe esagerato dire che la giustizia italiana è la giustizia degli avvocati e in subordine dei magistrati e delle procure. Quando si parla della giustizia che non funziona, stranamente non si parla mai di loro. La colpa è di tutti, dal Ministro agli uscieri; degli avvocati mai. Mancherà pure la carta per le fotocopiatrici, mancherà pure il personale, mancherà tutto quello che si vuole; ma quel che manca soprattutto è l’etica del rispetto, quella che non si può comprare ma sicuramente imporre fino a quando non si by choice and conviction that is done out of obligation and compulsion.
[]

Treatment Helicobacter 2009

But because lawyers are not the facts? Reformists

I always wondered why lawyers who make speeches or indictments, according to accuse or defend, they are not the facts. They need more and dodge, to open towards different directions, to minimize or exaggerate the facts and to place people in a context in which they are often like cabbage. One is accused of violence? Well, the lawyer who defends it says it's a good, a circumstance that helped a little old to carry a heavy pack on the first floor of the house, which is always the charity at the traffic lights, which defended the road to a girl from a molester , you always did his best for others and so on. Yes, but in fact the subject of proceedings, it was violent or not? Wow, says the lawyer who attacked him. There has to be violent to a child who liked to burn the rubbish bins and to break the street lamps in public lighting, which is the son of a thug, a mother who is a scoundrel, who has a sister who makes beautiful life and a drug addict and drug dealer brother. And then - ends - one with a face like that, that's scary just to see him, can not be a bad thing?
Now, because the judges do not interrupt the lawyers when they are incontinent and sproloquianti to go beyond the fact and fix in D? Why allow them to do appraisals on people who are unconnected to that fact? That encroach on ratings and Lombroso even racist? Why allow a girl who has been violated is referred to in court by a lawyer defending the rapist to appreciate damaging to his reputation, adding violence to violence?
up to me, for a genuine reform of justice, since the reform of all its operators. A cultural reform, including through mechanisms for offenders. Lawyers imporrei strict adherence to the fact of the dispute, the banner of essentiality.
Once the final exams, when written in Italian was an issue - I speak advisedly, having made the commissioner of the Italian dozens and dozens of state exams - the first criterion for consideration by the Board was " adherence to the track, "conditio sine qua non to avoid having to evaluate a paper, even a masterpiece, but the track had no relevance whatsoever, or only some limited reference.
Grip, therefore, essential. Would reduce the process time and especially do not turn the courtroom into chicken coops, with lots of roosters and hens that peck, to the detriment of the citizen, whether he is there as a defendant, either as victim or as a witness.
I think it happened to anyone in life to be in a courtroom. You will observe that it is one of the most annoying troubles, I say serious, there are others, saying the dogs. Indeed, even the dogs, not to offend the animals.
It happened to me a few years ago. I learned that unfortunate circumstance of being a slanderer, an arrogant, who enjoyed an insult to those who devote themselves to the common good. I had the guilt of having an article published in the journal in which I directed the wrongdoing complained of a mayor, who sued me thereof. That was a Communist mayor and sued us non per dimostrare che avesse ragione e noi torto, ma perché comunque ci infliggeva un danno economico, secondo una tattica ampiamente collaudata e applicata contro la stampa nemica. L’avvocato che difendeva quel sindaco ci accusò di essere dei calunniatori, avendo pubblicato notizie false e tendenziose, e che il suo cliente era così buono che era disposto a perdonarci. Noi rifiutammo la proposta di remissione di querela avanzata anche dal Presidente, che voleva accordarci, e chiedemmo invece che si discutesse nel merito. Per tutta risposta, quell’avvocato gridò ore rotundo e con gestualità teatrale: “Ecco, Signor Presidente, che Le avevo detto? Sono due tracotanti”.
E dire che I and my partner we were convinced that they are worthy of public morality!
On another occasion I heard was a violent, a tyrant, a torturer and "Say no more" - he said that miserable as a lawyer - because if I said what I know about him I would not leave the house. " Imagine, I had to go to school every day! Pure Inventions with the technique of preterizione: and do not say that ... , typical of lawyers. A veritable lynching, which the present case, moreover, had nothing to do, the President of the Court of Appeals watched it verbum quidem .
Recently, in the first trial against the young Colitti Ugento for the murder of Peppino Basile, the lawyer who defended him in his speech that turned out to things with the offense and the prosecution had nothing to do with anything, the series : The mayor had brought flowers to the girl who had testified, the thesis of the pastor "courage" and so on, which evoked bitter controversy that took place in the country and verging on politics. And when the mayor has publicly complained about the belligerent lawyer attacked him extra moenia. It did not stop there, because if it is taken with the Public Ministry and has also been received for the chief prosecutor, who had commented con molta prudenza e con rispetto la sentenza di assoluzione, da lui trovata “singolare”.
Gli avvocati dovrebbero darsi una regolata. Essi sono uno dei mali della giustizia. Anzi, non sarebbe esagerato dire che la giustizia italiana è la giustizia degli avvocati e in subordine dei magistrati e delle procure. Quando si parla della giustizia che non funziona, stranamente non si parla mai di loro. La colpa è di tutti, dal Ministro agli uscieri; degli avvocati mai. Mancherà pure la carta per le fotocopiatrici, mancherà pure il personale, mancherà tutto quello che si vuole; ma quel che manca soprattutto è l’etica del rispetto, quella che non si può comprare ma sicuramente imporre fino a quando non si by choice and conviction that is done out of obligation and compulsion.
[]