worse than the disease itself and speaking, especially when it produces terrible memories and there is a common national sentiment on the case, and indeed the tears produced are added other lacerations. It 's the case of each other Baptists, of which, now for a refusal of extradition for another hour, we still talk about it even at the risk of damaging international relations of our country, now with France, now with Brazil.
President Napolitano has bitterly admitted, we can not make ourselves understood by friends, near and far, on what has been terrorism in Italy and the sacrifices involved in combating it and defeat it. In diplomatic language is resentment against France and Brazil for having denied the murderer because Baptists serve the sentence in Italy.
Besides, in an atmosphere celebrating the unification of Italy Cesare Battisti evokes the name of other characters that deserve a very different recollection. Summon Cesare Battisti, the irredentist Trentino, socialist, friend of Mussolini in the days of "The Future of Work", executed by the Austrians in 1916 for his Italian. It is found about a century after having to share the same name complete, the first and last name with a terrorist, murderer and pluricondannato.
It is said that Baptists today is a good writer noir, a genre that clearly has it in the genetic and personal experience. The kids today who do not know more the history of Italy, do not know who is Cesare Battisti "a" but, by dint of the mention every day this name, they know who is Cesare Battisti "two", the only Cesare Battisti they know.
Some say it will put an end to this sad and unfortunate event when it will be extradited to Italy, where he will serve his four life sentences, sentence has been passed.
I disagree, not because she believes that should not serve his sentence - after all it is worth living in for years, some 'on the run and a bit' in prison - in fact, but because how could they get the things in Italy with his return will add damage damage, would open a new chapter. Risk of feeling about him for who knows how many more years. Because - We can be certain - would start the obsession of grace, as was the case for Adriano Sofri, leader of "Lotta Continua" condemned the murder as principal of the Commissioner Luigi Calabresi, now revered columnist of "La Repubblica". If only for this unfortunate event, doing violence to my concept of retributive justice education, I believe that Baptists should be left where it is.
not seem inconsistent. The story Baptists opened three fronts in debate over which we have to think coolly. One is that those who commit of criminal activity, whatever the reasons to have induced him, he must serve his sentence for priority social need and the respect for the victims. Two, dealing with a phenomenon so complex and varied as the terrorism was to be sought a political solution that includes and exceeds the individual cases, a sort of social amnesty. Three, you can not put the crisis in international relations to a matter that it is none of justice and internal history.
On the first front, I believe that those who commit a crime and is convicted should serve their sentence to the end, regardless of any and all consideration. It 'true that the Constitution of the Republic, art. 27, wants "The penis [...] are aimed at rehabilitation of the offender. " This does not mean that they should be granted. In living out the sentence, the offender can not only re-education, but it can become an example for others.
The second front, cossighiana the theory of "civil war", so you should find a political solution, one can not but note that it reduces the complex story of a war confined to the belligerent and excludes political society. In principle it is wrong to open gates in the sovereignty of the state, creating instability, free zones, within which to justify crimes against the state itself, its institutions and private citizens. It would mean that the state grant and grant some vacatio is at least one of the founding of the social contract: the administration of justice. And this is absolutely unacceptable. The political forces "belligerent" may recognize right and wrong, to have second thoughts or anything, but can not claim to create a vulnus the State, which must always impose the rule of law. In some respects the fact that Baptists are outside Italy and do not want to extradite him is not fair but affordable. If it was in Italy would be worse, would be out of the most heated argument innocent or guilty, or justificationism intransigent. We must not forget the thousands who were signatories of the manifesto in its favor. The damage that it would be politically would be even more serious than the first human and legal then.
The third front is different from the first two because it concerns the external relations of the state. Here are other more and more important interests. France, for example, is a sister nation, has always been part of the European Community. Is a different story of Carla Bruni luckily we are all children of his mother. We have economic relations with Brazil the most important. Undermining good relations with these two countries would be wrong. Of course, there is the slap trimming France a few years ago, when he graciously Battisti escape, and the slap of Brazil, who even deny us the reasons for extradition with offensive and damaging to our dignity.
If Italy was the country that the political authorities suspect Brazil, a country that is still resentful and ready to get back at Baptist, would not be an impossible reach into their house and let him go the way it deserves. As they always have and still do like some countries, between Communism and banditry, in which that Lula has always inspired.
Italy, however, is so civil that while requiring the extradition, an essential requirement for the legal culture, hopes it will not grant it to him for a cynical political expediency. But Lula can not understand this!
[]
0 comments:
Post a Comment