I must say that the way Hosni Mubarak, President of the Arab Republic of Egypt, was wound up and how power passed into the hands of the military is serious and worrying. It has all the characters dell'amerikanata. The policy of a country does not? Away, four shots and the change is made. We've seen a lot in this World War II. This time, then, it has crossed the line, has ennobled the square with the spirit of Martin Luther King. Quell'Obama, sooner or later, the sheriff would make it. And if not, how would be presented to the presidential election? The tree and the noose is the icon of many western movies. We wanted someone to hang.
Mubarak That I is not nice, as none of the heads of Arab Republics, despite having huge financial resources, keeping their populations in poverty. But what happened is a very serious, not alone and not because of an act formally correct, that the resignation of President Mubarak, even though not spontaneous and extorted by the pressure of the square, encouraged by the governments of the democratic West, and especially as it followed a clear violation of the constitutional charter that country, which provides that the resignation of head of state's successor is the President of the People.
The former ambassador, Sergio Romano historian and political observer said that "would agree, for the sake of clarity, call what happened with his name. We are applauding a military coup "(Corser, February 13). So it was a coup.
While not disregarding the political and constitutional issues, we are saying that the most worrying aspect of this story is the unusual step of power to the military, which could have dangerous results both in Egypt and across the Middle East area . We know that this is the hottest area politically and economically in the world, where the slightest movement in the countries concerned can break the balance of relations and triggering processes of containment difficult. There is, for example, Islam, there is the Suez Canal, there's oil. With Mubarak in power the situation was under control. What happens next? Brothers hear the sirens American and European Muslims or those most familiar of Islamic fundamentalism? Nor can we overlook the fact that the Egyptian crisis has come close to the Tunisian and may precede other across the Mediterranean region of Africa. We present a strategy, the terms of escape or be silenced for now, while not underestimating the causes immediate that the lack of participatory democracy unjust division of national resources, which have created a social situation for long periods of severe distress.
To return to the Egyptian case, it would be more correct and prudent to ensure that that Mubarak had promised peaceful management of the crisis, changes in a more democratic constitution, new elections in September and his retirement from the political scene. Instead we witnessed the blessing of the coup, if we do not want to say in its preparation by all registries democratic, from the first, that in fact American, the other obedient in specie in the world and to Europe.
Again We have seen methods like Freemasonry. La Loggia said central and peripheral obey. Not governments, are free and responsible, but Masonic lodges and loggias have proven European governments. The much-vaunted united Europe once again proved to be a political abstraction.
Sergio Romano, a memory for diplomatic caution, we only ask "why almost all democratic governments have welcomed a coup with satisfaction." But his answer, according to which the military would ensure stability and the people is always right, is unconvincing. It 's the first that found, of course, to say what he really thinks. The military is an instrument of order, ensure the stability of their power over orders. But if there is no one give her any orders, which are the military? Self-ordering or obey a paper, which remains silent if someone is not the law.
We all know what they can do the military in power. It is incredible that the political and democratic governments have forgotten the experiences of Chile, Argentina, Cambodia, and so on in the endless geography of military dictatorships in the world.
regard to the fact that the people is always right, you must agree. If the will is expressed through free elections is one thing, but if it is expressed through the anarchic fury and brutal, as we have also seen in Egypt in the days of tougher challenge, even with the onslaught of the Museum, is another. This might suggest similar solutions, to become a trend. Some idiot ours, it has even advocated for Italy, as if to say mubarakizzare Berlusconi.
The traumatic end to all power - and you do not see why the Egyptian case should be different - producing periods of anarchy and confusion, during which there is bleeding with the parties to make sure the power with which the unknown what follows can be worse than what was there before. The Iranian case, with the end of the monarchy of the Shah and Khomeini's return, should have prompted the leaders of the West, so-called free and democratic, with greater caution. Or is there still some who believe that Iran and the current president of Hayatollah Acmadinejad is to be preferred to that of the Shah Reza Palahvi? Question that applies to both the internal conditions of that country and for the conditions of the whole Middle East area.
Now we have to suffer the first and immediate consequences. Thousands of refugees are flocking to our shores, producing a situation of humanitarian emergency, with what will follow shortly.
[]
0 comments:
Post a Comment